Tax Audit Cases · Due by 31 Oct 2026 (where accounts are liable to audit u/s 44AB)
Office No. 102, Snehraj Apartment, Baner, Pune — 411045+91 77570 45059
3 July 20269 min readFiled under Startups & FundingAngel Tax / Fundraising / Startup India / Section 56 / Section 68 / Pune

Angel Tax Abolished: What the End of Section 56(2)(viib) Means for Startup Fundraising (2026)

For over a decade, angel tax punished startups for raising at a good valuation — taxing the premium above fair value as the company's income. From Assessment Year 2025-26 the provision is gone, for every class of investor. Here is what it was, what its removal changes for a 2026 round, and the Section 68 discipline that has not gone away.

CA Rahul Dang

CA Rahul Dang

Founder & Practice Lead

Angel Tax Abolished: What the End of Section 56(2)(viib) Means for Startup Fundraising (2026)

The tax that used to punish raising money is gone

For over a decade, the strangest line item in Indian startup fundraising was "angel tax" — a tax the company paid for the crime of raising capital at a good valuation. If an investor paid more per share than a tax officer thought the shares were worth, the difference was treated as the company's income and taxed. From Assessment Year 2025-26, that provision no longer applies. It has been removed for every kind of investor. If you are raising a round in 2026, one of the biggest historical tax risks at the seed stage is simply off the table.

Here is what angel tax was, what its removal changes, and — importantly — what has not changed, so you do not get complacent.

What angel tax actually was

Angel tax lived in Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. When a closely held company (which nearly every startup is) issued shares to a resident for more than their fair market value, the excess of the consideration over that fair value was taxed in the company's hands as "income from other sources".

Read that again, because it is genuinely odd: the money an investor put in above a benchmark valuation was treated as the startup's taxable income. A founder could close a round, spend the money building the company, and then face a tax demand on part of the capital they had raised — often because a valuation report and an assessing officer disagreed about what a pre-revenue company was worth.

Why it caused so much pain

The problem was never the rule in theory; it was the valuation fight in practice. Startup valuations are forward-looking and negotiated. Tax officers assessed them backward-looking, on net asset value, and routinely rejected the discounted-cash-flow valuations founders relied on. That gap produced years of notices, disputes and demands landing on companies that had no profits to pay them from. DPIIT-recognised startups could claim an exemption by filing a declaration, but the process itself became a reason many rounds were structured defensively.

What changed, and from when

The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 abolished Section 56(2)(viib). The provision is not applicable with effect from Assessment Year 2025-26 — that is, for share consideration received on or after 1 April 2024. And the removal is not limited to startups or to resident investors. An earlier change had actually widened angel tax in 2023 to cover investment from non-residents too; the 2024 abolition swept the whole provision away for everyone: residents, non-residents, funds and individual angels alike.

The practical effect: you no longer need to defend the premium on your round against a fair-market-value benchmark, and DPIIT-recognised startups no longer need the specific 56(2)(viib) exemption declaration to raise safely. That whole category of risk is closed.

What has NOT changed — do not get complacent

The end of angel tax does not mean funding is now tax-scrutiny-free. Two provisions still very much apply, and they catch sloppy paperwork:

  • Section 68 — unexplained cash credits. If money comes into the company and you cannot establish the identity of the investor, their creditworthiness, and the genuineness of the transaction, it can still be added to income and taxed. This is not about valuation; it is about proving the money is real and traceable. Keep investor KYC, bank trails and board approvals clean.
  • Section 56(2)(x) — receipt of property below value. The mirror-image rule on the investor's side, where someone receives shares for less than fair value, is untouched. Down-round and sweat-equity structuring still needs care.

So the discipline that used to be about defending your valuation is now about documenting your investors. Different risk, same need for a clean file.

What founders raising in 2026 should still do

  • Keep a valuation report for the round on record — not to defend against angel tax anymore, but for FEMA pricing on any foreign investment, for future due diligence, and for your own board.
  • Maintain full KYC and source-of-funds records for every investor, so Section 68 can never be a question.
  • Paper the round properly: board and shareholder resolutions, the return of allotment (Form PAS-3), and updated registers.

How we handle it at RDA, Baner

At RDA Advisory, Baner, we now close funding rounds without the old angel-tax defence file — but with a tighter investor-documentation file. We keep the valuation report for FEMA and diligence, run investor KYC and source-of-funds checks so Section 68 never surfaces, and complete the allotment paperwork on the MCA portal. For rounds with foreign investors, we handle the FEMA pricing and reporting alongside. The result is a round that is clean today and clean when a Series A diligence team reads it in two years. Office No. 102, Snehraj Apartment, Baner, Pune 411045 · call +91 77570 45059.

Raising a round? Paper it right

Closing a funding round in Pune? RDA handles valuation, investor documentation, the MCA allotment filings and FEMA reporting so the round is compliant end to end. Book a consult at rdatax.in or call +91 77570 45059 — RDA Advisory, Baner, Pune. See the full set of startup tax benefits in our Startup India and DPIIT recognition guide, and the Section 80-IAC tax holiday.


Verification note: Material positions — Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("angel tax" on share consideration received by a closely held company above fair market value, taxed as income from other sources), its abolition by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 with effect from Assessment Year 2025-26 (for consideration received on or after 1 April 2024) for all classes of investor including non-residents, and the continuing application of Section 68 (unexplained cash credits, requiring proof of the investor's identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of the transaction) and Section 56(2)(x) — are sourced from the Income Tax Department (incometaxindia.gov.in), the Press Information Bureau (pib.gov.in) and Startup India (startupindia.gov.in). Provisions change with each Finance Act; confirm the current position for your round with your CA before relying on it.

Common questions

Frequently asked.

Is angel tax still applicable in 2026?
No. Section 56(2)(viib), the angel-tax provision, was abolished by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 and is not applicable with effect from Assessment Year 2025-26 — that is, for share consideration received on or after 1 April 2024. The removal applies to all classes of investor, resident and non-resident.
What was angel tax?
It was a tax under Section 56(2)(viib) on a closely held company that issued shares for more than their fair market value. The excess of the consideration over fair value was treated as the company's income from other sources and taxed. In practice it triggered valuation disputes with assessing officers on pre-revenue startups.
Does the abolition cover foreign investors too?
Yes. A 2023 amendment had actually widened angel tax to cover non-resident investment; the 2024 abolition swept the whole provision away for everyone — residents, non-residents, funds and individual angels. There is no remaining angel-tax exposure on the premium of a normal round.
Do I still need a valuation report when I raise?
Yes, but for different reasons. It is no longer needed to defend against angel tax, but you still need it for FEMA pricing on any foreign investment, for future due diligence, and for your own board record. Keep a proper valuation on file for every round.
What tax risks remain when raising capital?
Chiefly Section 68 — unexplained cash credits. If money comes into the company and you cannot establish the investor's identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of the transaction, it can still be added to income and taxed. Keep full investor KYC, bank trails and board approvals. Section 56(2)(x) on receipt of property below value also still applies.
Start the conversation

Talk to RDA about your round

Drop your name and number — we'll call within 4 working hours and make sure your round is papered clean for today and for future diligence.

No spam. No newsletter sign-up. Just a call when you’re ready. We use your details to respond to your enquiry — see our Privacy Policy.

Engagements like this start with a call.

Book a consultation
Related articles

More on Startups & Funding

Liquidation Preference: The Term-Sheet Clause That Decides How Much You Actually Keep When You Sell (India 2026)
Liquidation PreferenceTerm Sheet
8 July 202611 min read

Liquidation Preference: The Term-Sheet Clause That Decides How Much You Actually Keep When You Sell (India 2026)

Founders argue for weeks about valuation and barely read the liquidation preference — then discover on the day they sell that the valuation hardly mattered. This is the clause that decides who gets paid first, and how much, when your company is sold: what it really is, the two variables that control it (the multiple, and whether it 'participates'), the exit waterfall worked through in rupees, how preferences stack across rounds, and how the whole thing is built into an Indian deal through CCPS under Section 43 of the Companies Act.

CA Rahul DangFounder & Practice Lead
Read
Drag-Along and Tag-Along Rights: The Two Clauses That Decide Whether You Can Be Forced to Sell — or Left Behind (India 2026)
Drag-AlongTag-Along
8 July 202611 min read

Drag-Along and Tag-Along Rights: The Two Clauses That Decide Whether You Can Be Forced to Sell — or Left Behind (India 2026)

Founders read the valuation and the liquidation preference and skim past drag-along and tag-along as boilerplate. They are not boilerplate: a drag-along can compel you to sell your shares in a deal you did not choose, and a tag-along stops you selling your own shares without your investors coming along. What each clause actually does, why the drag-along threshold is the number to negotiate, how a forced sale flows through your liquidation waterfall, and the India-specific enforceability question — the SHA versus the Articles of Association, Section 58(2), V.B. Rangaraj, Vodafone, and the oppression remedy under Sections 241-242.

CA Rahul DangFounder & Practice Lead
Read
See all in Startups & Funding